Method and system for capturing user interface structure in a model based software system

ABSTRACT

Method and system for capturing device-independent user interface structure in a model based software system are disclosed. In one embodiment, at least one entry point is received from a user by a business system. Further, a user interface corresponding to the at least one entry point is provided. Furthermore, user interface meta-data associated with the user interface is captured. Also, at least one event associated with user interface elements is identified as a response to user actions based on the captured user-interface meta-data. In addition, a pattern signature is identified in the model based software system for reuse in one or more model based software systems based on an expected behavior of the user interface when the identified at least one event occurs. Then, the identified at least one event is mapped to the identified pattern signature.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

Benefit is claimed under 35 U.S.C. 120 to U.S. non provisional application Ser. No. 12/238,469, entitled “USER INTERFACES AND SOFTWARE REUSE IN MODEL BASED SOFTWARE SYSTEMS” by inventor Sundararajan Parthasarathy et al., filed Sep. 26, 2008, which was a divisional patent application of co-pending application Ser. No. 11/065,007 filed on Feb. 24, 2005 entitled “User interfaces and software reuse in model based software systems” claiming priority to the following three provisional applications:

U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/553,091, entitled “User Interface Driven Data Modeling Approach” by inventor Sundararajan Parthasarathy et al., filed Mar. 15, 2004, which is herein incorporated in its entirety by reference for all purposes.

U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/553,089, entitled “An Approach to Identify Software Re-Use in a Model Based Software Solution” by inventor Raghuraman Devalla et al., filed Mar. 15, 2004, which is herein incorporated in its entirety by reference for all purposes.

U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/553,088, entitled “A Formal Approach to Design Generation of Multi-tier Applications Using Behavior Patterns” by inventor Rajagopalan Sethuraman et al., filed Mar. 15, 2004, which is herein incorporated in its entirety by reference for all purposes. The aforementioned applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to model based software systems, and in particular, capturing user interface structure in the model based software systems.

BACKGROUND

Model based software solutions involve approaches and implementations in which every significant part of a software development lifecycle is modeled as data and persisted with capabilities that enable a user to perform various steps in the software development lifecycle. This data modeling requires a high level of specialization, and is usually carried out just before the start of coding. The modeled data is persisted and can be used by downstream processes thereby ensuring that all relevant data that is captured by upstream processes are used in the downstream processes without any significant loss of information.

The traditional approach to the data modeling involves an understanding of the system in its entirety including all the data dependencies between various entities in the system. A schema designer who models data, requires detailed information on various business processes addressed by the system and various constituents of the system. For example, the schema designer requires information in terms of entities that need to be stored in the system and their relationship with other data that are to be stored in the system. The data types and sizes of those entities also need to be stored.

This schema can then be represented diagrammatically and reviewed by functional specialists. As the number of entities increase, their interconnections with other entities also increase thereby increasing the complexity of the schema. A fully represented schematic diagram for a fairly complex system has many interconnections that explain the origin and destination of the relationship lines between entities.

The granularity of data captured in a model based environment depends on an extent that the model is used. For example, if functional requirements are captured at a very granular level, it enables a designer to implement these requirements with the exact business logic as envisioned by a requirements engineer.

During a typical modeling process, business logic that is captured at one point in a system is quite often applicable at some other point in the system. However, because of the granularity of the business logic, the set of business rules that may be needed to be reused may not be a single rule but a set of business rules which may form a subset of the business logic implemented elsewhere. Even though these business rules are not reused by the requirements engineer, the design engineer who analyzes them may benefit if he can identify the reuse of the business rules across the various actions. Unfortunately, the task of identifying this subset of the huge set of business rules that exist in the business process is time consuming and strenuous. This makes reuse identification a near impossibility for the design engineer.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the present invention are illustrated by way of an example and not limited to the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:

FIG. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a method of capturing user interface structure in a model based software system, according to an embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating identifying pattern signatures in the model based software system, according to an embodiment.

FIG. 3 illustrates a computing system that may be used in connection with the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a screen shot depicting exemplary entry points for obtaining a user interface, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 5 is a screen shot depicting exemplary user interface structure, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 6 is a screen shot depicting exemplary user interface controls in the user interface structure, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 7 is a screen shot depicting mapping of user actions to events, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 8 is an exemplary screen shot depicting the pattern signatures identified in the model based software system, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 9 is a screen shot depicting mapping of events to the identified pattern signatures, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 10 is a screen shot depicting an expected behavior of the user interface when the identified event occurs, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 11 is a screen shot illustrating naming conventions used for generating service interfaces and method interfaces, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 12 is an exemplary screen shot for generating service interfaces and method interfaces, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 13 is a screen shot illustrating mapping the user interface controls to the identified pattern signatures for generating service interfaces, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 14 is another exemplary screen shot for generating method interfaces, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 15 is another exemplary screen shot for generating service interfaces, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 16 is a block diagram of a user interface structure capturing module of FIG. 3, according to one embodiment.

Other features of the present embodiments will be apparent from the accompanying drawings and from the detailed description that follows.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A software solution is a collection of user interfaces between a user and a repository, where the user's data are stored. These interfaces could be displays, reports, and/or devices such as scanners and readers.

Any such interface can be visualized as a business document with a header section that uniquely identifies the business document. The business document further has various sections, each of which captures related data at various stages in a lifecycle of the business document. Such business documents also refer to other documents for information relating to certain key data items in the document. These could be references to external documents or data copied from the relevant business documents.

An usual approach of designing the user interfaces is to capture data for an underlying business in various stages. Each stage adds value to the data that has been already captured. At each of these stages the data captured has direct relevance to the business document that has been considered for automation.

In an embodiment of the invention, a user interface may normally have several types of user interface elements/controls. There are single instance user interface elements such as edit controls, check boxes and text areas. There are also multiple instance data sets that reflect the various constituents of a business document. These normally reflect the table of data that is present in the business documents, and are incorporated in the user interfaces as grid controls. Also, there are single instance data items that have a predefined list of values of which one can be selected for a particular instance of a business document. These are incorporated in the user interface as Combo Boxes or List controls. Additionally, sets of single instance data items are present as elements, some or all of which could be applicable for the instance of the business document. These can be incorporated as a group of check boxes. There are also non-editable user elements that reflect various business states in which a document can exist at any point in time. These are typically incorporated as display only controls. And there are links to other user interfaces that reflect the references to other business documents that could be referred to for additional information. These may be incorporated as hyperlinks or command buttons that invoke other user interfaces by passing the required context information. Lastly, there are reference data items that reflect data that are copied from the other business documents and are displayed in the user interface. These are incorporated as display only controls in the user interface.

After establishing the methodology of mapping various user elements to probable business documents, the data model is formed for the business document. A business object (BO) represents the business document, and interface businesses object (IBO) refers to the business documents from where the information is acquired. Both business objects and interface business objects have data segments that refer to the various sections of the business documents and the related business documents. Each data segment has a unique identifier which uniquely identifies an instance of data in the data segment. A hierarchy of data segments can also be established. This can be accomplished by specifying a parent segment to each data segment. A data item of a data segment could be owned by the data segment itself or be present as a reference to another interface business object, a data segment, or a data item.

In an embodiment, factors that affect such a business object hierarchy are as follows. First, every collection of related user interfaces forms a business object. Second, every related collection of referred user interfaces forms an interface business object. Third, every section in the user interface is a data segment. Fourth, any list of values is a data segment from an interface business object. Fifth, any display only field that displays data from other collections is not stored as data but refers to the corresponding data in the interface business objects. Recording the corresponding interface business object, segment, and data items depicts such relations.

In another embodiment, a database schema can be derived out of this structure of business objects and interface business objects. The physical representation of this embodiment is as follows. Every data segment is represented as database tables, and each of these tables has a primary key formed by the identifier that is a part of the segment and the identifiers of its parent segments. Foreign keys are identified for any data items that refer to interface business objects. Every data segment of an interface business object can be represented as database views or database stored procedures. The data items of the data segment are columns for the corresponding database tables. The data items of the interface business objects are the columns of the corresponding database views or the parameters of the database stored procedures used for integration. This embodiment directly attempts to arrive at a fairly comprehensive database schema that can be further refined for any specific database requirements such as audit trail and concurrency control implications. This embodiment provides a direct relationship of the database schema to the user interface, an intuitive approach to database design that enables a high level of consistency with the user interface, and a quick first cut schema to facilitate overall understanding of the business functionality.

FIG. 1 is a flowchart 100 illustrating a method of capturing device-independent user interface structure in a model based software system, according to an embodiment. At step 105, at least one entry point is received by a business system. The entry point includes at least one of a menu item, hyperlink, and/or an option from an application. For example, the entry point is provided by the user/system administrator using one of the above options. At step 110, a user interface corresponding to the at least one entry is displayed on a display device. At step 115, user interface meta-data associated with the user interface is captured. The user-interface meta-data includes specification data associated with the user interface.

At step 120, at least one event associated with user interface elements is identified as a response to user actions based on the captured user-interface meta-data. The event includes one or more actions linked to the behavior of the user interface elements. In one example embodiment, a type of each user action is specified. Further, user interface elements that are involved in each user action are specified. Then, the at least one event associated with user interface elements is identified. For example, the user interface elements include but not limited to edit controls, check boxes, text areas, Combo Boxes, List controls, tabular data, check boxes, display only controls, hyperlinks, command buttons, charts and/or graphs.

At step 125, a pattern signature is identified in the model based software system for reuse in one or more model based software systems based on an expected behavior of the user interface when the identified at least one event occurs. The step of identifying the pattern signature is explained in detail with respect to FIG. 2. At step 130, the identified at least one event is mapped to the identified pattern signature, thus obtaining the user interface structure in the model based software system. Further, based on the mapping, other user interface elements corresponding to the pattern signature are identified to achieve the expected behavior of the user interface.

With respect to the above describes embodiments, the model based software system is used to generate service interfaces, method interfaces, and a sequence of method calls. The exemplary way of generating service interfaces and method interfaces are illustrated with respect to FIGS. 11-15. Further, the user interface structure can be rendered on different types of devices including but not limited to desktop, mobiles, tablets, and/or other hand held devices and hence the user interface structure is device-independent.

Further with respect to the above described embodiments with respect to FIG. 1, a specification repository captures extensive information on the user interfaces and sequence of user actions that are needed at different layers. This is a humungous task when there is a need to develop and deploy software systems that involve hundreds of business components and/or functions. This embodiment then abstracts user interfaces and user action sequences based on the expected response of the system. This abstraction is based on the study of different user actions and the expected behavior of the system in response, and also the participating user interface elements/controls. The expected response of the system is captured as a set of specification data for each user action.

Each user action is associated with the user interface information that influences the behavior, and each user action is modeled as a different variety of action based on the expected behavior of the system. For example, a user interaction may be modeled as a document fetch type if the action requires that the system take a key element from the user interface and come up with all information pertaining to that particular business document.

In an example embodiment, to design the middle tier elements for implementing the system response for a user interaction, the designer specifies the type of user action, the user interface controls that are involved in this action, and the expected behavior of the system. The expected response of the system is specified as binary logic (Yes/No) to a variety of questions (e.g., whether refresh is required, related combo to be filled, etc.) This information is stored in the data model. Design generators then use this model information to generate the service interfaces and method interfaces, and invoking back end objects interfaces also, to generate the sequence of these method calls. A facility is provided to override these interfaces to do a dataset reduction of the interface elements of the methods. The design generators take care of passing the appropriate parameters across the different layers.

The salient advantages of this pattern based design are, first, the resulting simplified interface and sequence specifications across layers. This simplified procedure enables the design work to be done by non-specialists who have an understanding of the application. Second, automated plumbing of interfaces across different software artifacts in different layers leads to reduced defects in terms of interface mismatches. Third, there is a standardized design across the entire development team leading to better maintainability. This helps to reduce the dependency of persons to either enhance the product or fix defects. Fourth, there is reduced time for design specifications leading to better productivity. Since the middle layer design is driven by expected response it does not require any special skills and can be effectively done by a business user also.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart 200 illustrating identifying pattern signatures in the model based software system, according to an embodiment. At step 205, a set of business rules is provided for each business component in a business process of the model based software system. The set of business rules provides a business logic used in each business component. The set of business rules includes a sequence of business rules associated with each action performed by an end user. In one example embodiment, every function in the system has a set of business rules, and a group of business rules is associated with a particular action performed by an end user. These groups can be completely or partially used as part of another task. Identifying this set of business rules is a challenge for a design engineer. In this embodiment, there are two categories of reuse. First, there are a set of rules in which their identification markers repeat across other actions. Second, there are a set of rules that, after considering the contents of the business rules, repeat across other actions. In either instance however, the repetition indicates the possibility of reuse.

At step 210, the sequence of business rules associated with each action in the model based software system are scanned. In an embodiment, each distinct action is considered. For each action, a sequential scan is made from the first business rule to the last business rule. At step 215, a first pattern signature associated with an action is formed based on the scanning As the scan progresses the system forms a pattern signature that uniquely identifies the business rules encountered so far in the sequence. The result is that at the end of this step each action may have a pattern signature associated with it.

At step 220, a check is made to determine if the first pattern signature is present in other actions in the model based software system. If the first pattern signature is present in other actions, the first pattern signature is included in a set of pattern signatures of the model based software system at step 225. If the first pattern signature is not present in other actions, the step of determining is repeated for a second pattern signature that is a subset of the first pattern signature at step 230. At step 235, the steps of forming and determining are repeated for each action. With respect to steps 220-235, a scan is made through the pattern signature to identify if any part of the signature occurs in the pattern signature of the other actions. If such an occurrence is made then the subset is identified as a pattern and recorded separately along with its occurrences. This process is continued for all actions. If in this process a pattern is identified that consists of other patterns, then this pattern hierarchy is also maintained. At the end of this process the system has data in terms of the various patterns and their occurrences.

At step 240, the set of pattern signatures is analyzed. At step 245, similarities in the set of pattern signatures are identified based on the analysis. At step 250, the pattern signatures that can be reused in the one or more model based software systems are identified based on the similarities in the set of pattern signatures.

In another example embodiment, a designer analyzes this data, and identifies the best possible reuse(s). There are several points that the designer may consider in this process. First, the designer may want to maximize business rule reuse by selecting a pattern with the maximum size, irrespective of its occurrences. The advantage of this approach is that the designer can identify bigger chunks of business logic that can be implemented across the system. Second, the designer may choose to maximize occurrence reuse by selecting patterns that cover the maximum number of actions. This embodiment permits the designer to reduce design effort by spreading the effort over a greater number of tasks. Since the reuse is high with this embodiment, adequate care could be exercised in designing for such patterns. Third, a designer could maximize the total number of business rules that need not be designed for, as a result of pattern reuse. This embodiment ensures that the maximum amount of patterns that can be reused has been extracted, thereby reducing the overall design effort.

In several embodiments, various aspects may be considered before finally arriving at the patterns whose reuses are to be adopted. One such consideration is that as a pattern size is reduced, the reuse of that pattern becomes trivial. That is to say, certain business rules repeat in all actions and are trivial in nature. These should be reused only if it gives a significant benefit for the designers. Reusing patterns that have a negligible business rule count could result in a design overhead that would impact the overall size and effectiveness of the solution.

In another example embodiment, in the process of identifying the pattern signature, the description of the business rule is considered. First, white spaces and special characters other than numerical operators are removed. The actions are then analyzed and pattern signatures formed for every action. Then once the pattern signature is formed, the reuse identification process is similar to that of the embodiment of the first approach.

The advantage of this approach is that it relies on the content of the business rule rather than the identifier of the business rule. While in all likelihood this may be a more time consuming process as the operations have to be carried out on the business rule descriptions (rather than just the identifiers), the result may be more effective than that obtained from the other approach (since it is based on the description which by design holds more information). The approach a user adopts depends on the user's needs and the satisfaction level he/she obtains in analyzing the reuse in each of the approaches. The process flow is illustrated in FIG. 2.

These approaches for identifying reuse in a model based environment have several advantages. First, there is a tremendous saving of time as a majority of the operations described can be automated. Second, the embodiments are highly effective as each and every business rule is analyzed and all the various combinations are identified. Third, there is a significant saving of design effort as patterns identified may result in decreased design effort leading to a reduction in the construction efforts also.

FIG. 3 is an overview diagram of hardware and an operating environment 300 in conjunction with which embodiments of the invention may be practiced. The description of FIG. 3 is intended to provide a brief, a general description of suitable computer hardware and a suitable computing environment in conjunction with which the invention may be implemented. In some embodiments, the invention is described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer, such as a personal computer. Generally, the program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.

Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCS, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computer environments, where tasks are performed by I/O remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, the program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.

In the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, the hardware and operating environment is provided that is applicable to any of the servers and/or remote clients shown in FIGS. 1-2.

As shown in FIG. 3, one embodiment of the hardware and operating environment includes a general purpose computing device in the form of a computer 20 (e.g., a personal computer, workstation, or server), including one or more processing units 21, a system memory 22, and a system bus 23 that operatively couples various system components including the system memory 22 to the processing unit 21. There may be only one or there may be more than one processing unit 21, such that the processor of the computer 20 includes a single central-processing unit (CPU), or a plurality of processing units, commonly referred to as a multiprocessor or parallel-processor environment. In various embodiments, the computer 20 is a conventional computer, a distributed computer, or any other type of computer.

The system bus 23 can be any of several types of bus structures including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. The system memory 22 can also be referred to as simply the memory, and, in some embodiments, includes read-only memory (ROM) 24 and random-access memory (RAM) 25. A basic input/output system (BIOS) 26, containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within the computer 20, such as during start-up, may be stored in the ROM 24. The computer 20 further includes a hard disk drive 27 for reading from and writing to a hard disk (not shown), a magnetic disk drive 28 for reading from or writing to a removable magnetic disk 29, and an optical disk drive 30 for reading from or writing to a removable optical disk 31 such as a CD ROM or other optical media.

The hard disk drive 27, magnetic disk drive 28, and optical disk drive 30 are coupled with a hard disk drive interface 32, a magnetic disk drive interface 33, and an optical drive interface 34, respectively. The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide a non volatile storage of computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for the computer 20. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that any type of computer-readable media which can store data that is accessible by the computer 20, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, Bernoulli cartridges, random access memories (RAMs), read only memories (ROMs), redundant arrays of independent disks (e.g., RAID) and the like, can be used in the exemplary hardware and operating environment.

A plurality of program modules can be stored on the hard disk drive 27, magnetic disk drive 29, optical disk drive 31, ROM 24, or RAM 25, including an operating system 35, one or more application programs 36, other program modules such as user interface (UI) structure capturing module 37, and program data 38. A plug-in containing a security transmission engine for the present invention can be resident on any one or number of these computer-readable media.

A user may enter commands and information into the computer 20 through input devices such as a keyboard 40 and a pointing device 42. Other input devices (not shown) can include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 21 through a serial port interface 46 that is coupled to the system bus 23, but can be connected by other interfaces, such as a parallel port, game port, or a universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 47 or other type of display device can also be connected to the system bus 23 via an interface, such as a video adapter 48. The monitor 47 can display a graphical user interface (GUI) for the user. In addition to the monitor 47, the computer 20 typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers and printers.

The computer 20 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers or servers, such as a remote computer 49. These logical connections are achieved by a communication device coupled to or a part of the computer 20; the invention is not limited to a particular type of communications device. The remote computer 49 can be another computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a client, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above I/O relative to the computer 20, although only a memory storage device 50 has been illustrated. The logical connections depicted in FIG. 3 include a local area network (LAN) 51 and/or a wide area network (WAN) 52. Such networking environments are commonplace in office networks, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and the internet, which are all types of networks.

When used in a LAN-networking environment, the computer 20 is connected to the LAN 51 through a network interface or adapter 53, which is one type of communications device. In some embodiments, when used in a WAN-networking environment, the computer 20 typically includes a modem 54 (another type of communications device) or any other type of communications device, e.g., a wireless transceiver, for establishing communications over the wide-area network 52, such as the internet. The modem 54, which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 23 via the serial port interface 46. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computer 20 can be stored in the remote memory storage device 50 of the remote computer or server 49. It is appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of, and communications devices for, establishing a communications link between the computers may be used including hybrid fiber-coax connections, T1-T3 lines, DSL's, OC-3 and/or OC-12, TCP/IP, microwave, wireless application protocol, and any other electronic media through any suitable switches, routers, outlets and power lines, as the same are known and understood by one of ordinary skilled in the art. Further, the user interface (UI) structure capturing module 37 is explained in detail with respect to FIG. 16.

Further, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium includes instructions that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform the above described methods and systems.

FIG. 4 is a screen shot 400 depicting exemplary entry points for obtaining a user interface, according to one embodiment. Particularly FIG. 4 shows the entry points are received from a user to launch a specific user interface. FIG. 5 is a screen shot 500 depicting exemplary user interface structure, according to one embodiment. Particularly, FIG. 5 illustrates organizing sections associated with a user interface. For example, the user interface structure is organized using the user interface controls 510 such as source section name, target section name, horizontal order and vertical order associated with the organizing sections field 505.

FIG. 6 is a screen shot 600 depicting exemplary user interface controls in the user interface structure, according to one embodiment. Particularly the exemplary user interface includes an option 605 to define the user interface controls as shown in FIG. 6. The user interface controls include a control name, control caption, control type and so on that are used to specify the user interface layout. Further, the tabular data 610 shows the exemplary specifications of the user interfaces and the field 615 includes the user interface controls that are used to specify/enter the type of user interface.

FIG. 7 is a screen shot 700 depicting mapping of user actions to events, according to one embodiment. Particularly, the exemplary user interface includes an option 705 to define the user actions. For example, a user/designer specifies a type of user action, and then the user interface controls 715 that are involved in the user action are retrieved from the model based software system. For example, the block 710 depicts the user actions that are mapped to the user interface controls. Further, the user interface controls 715 (e.g., control name, column name and control caption) as a response to user actions (entered by the user/designer) are mapped to events (e.g., event name 720) in the model based software system as illustrated in exemplary FIG. 7. For example, the user interface controls 715 (e.g., CMB bank) as a response to user actions (entered by the user/designer) are mapped to event name (e.g., on select change) in the model based software system.

FIG. 8 is an exemplary screen shot 800 depicting the pattern signatures identified in the model based software system, according to one embodiment. Particularly, FIG. 8 illustrates an add action patterns option 805 to create an action pattern (i.e., pattern signature) for use in the one or more model based software systems. The create action pattern field 810 enables to specify an action pattern and description associated with the action pattern for creating the action pattern. In the example embodiment of FIG. 8, the action pattern description specified is “fetch”. Further, upon specifying the action pattern, the setup action pattern properties field 815 allows a designer to select specific properties from a predefined set of properties for the selected action pattern “fetch”. The action pattern is created based on the selected properties.

FIG. 9 is a screen shot 900 depicting mapping of events to the identified pattern signatures, according to one embodiment. Particularly, FIG. 9 illustrates an associate action patterns to events option 905 to map identified events (e.g., as shown in FIG. 7) to the identified pattern signatures (e.g., as shown in FIG. 8). Further, the option 905 maps the events to pattern signatures and allows a user/designer to select/subscribe for particular mappings as shown in table 910. For example, the event “link clicked” is mapped to the action pattern “HdrChkMLSav” in the model based software system as shown in FIG. 9.

FIG. 10 is a screen shot 1000 depicting an expected behavior of the user interface when the identified event occurs, according to one embodiment. Particularly, FIG. 10 illustrates mapping user interface controls to action patters using a map controls to action pattern option 1005 and an action response associated with the mapping. Table 1010 depicts the expected behavior of the user interface based on the mapping user interface controls to the action patterns.

FIG. 11 is a screen shot 1100 illustrating naming conventions used for generating service interfaces and method interfaces, according to one embodiment. For example, as shown in FIG. 11, the value 1110 “CBDef” is used as a naming convention for the category 1105 “Combo Default Identifier”, the value 1110 “CHHdr” is used as a naming convention for the category 1105 “Combo header Identifier”, and so on. These values are used as the naming conventions for generating service interfaces and method interfaces as shown in FIGS. 12-15.

FIG. 12 is an exemplary screen shot 1200 for generating service interfaces and method interfaces, according to one embodiment. The generate specification option 1205 allows a designer to generate service interfaces and/or method interfaces upon selecting the containers as shown in field 1210. The table 1215 depicts the generated service and method interfaces based on the selected containers. Further, the screen shot 1200 also depicts an option to refine the generated service and method interfaces using the refinement options such as specify web service, specify document, refine specification and so on.

FIG. 13 is a screen shot 1300 illustrating mapping the user interface controls to the identified pattern signatures for generating service interfaces, according to one embodiment. Particularly, the usage of the segment field 1310 includes all the mapped user interface controls with the action patterns shown in action type field 1305. Further, the fields 1315, 1320 and 1325 depict the service and method interfaces generated. Similarly, FIG. 14 is another exemplary screen shot 1400 for generating method interfaces, according to one embodiment. FIG. 15 is another exemplary screen shot 1500 for generating service interfaces, according to one embodiment.

FIG. 16 is a block diagram 1600 of a user interface structure capturing module 37 of FIG. 3, according to one embodiment. Particularly, the user interface structure capturing module 37 includes a user interface (UI) generation module 1605, a meta-data capturing module 1610, an event identification module 1615, a pattern-signature identification module 1620, and a mapping module 1625 interconnected with each other.

In operation, the UI generation module 1605 receives the entry points in a business system and provides a user interface corresponding to the entry points. The meta-data capturing module 1610 captures user interface meta-data associated with the user interface. The event identification module 1615 identifies events associated with user interface elements as a response to user actions based on the captured user-interface meta-data. The pattern-signature identification module 1620 identifies a pattern signature in the model based software system for reuse in one or more model based software systems based on an expected behavior of the user interface when the identified at least one event occurs. The mapping module 1625 maps the identified events to the identified pattern signatures, thereby structuring the user interface in the model based software system.

In the foregoing detailed description of embodiments of the invention, various features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments of the invention require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the detailed description of embodiments of the invention, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment. It is understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. It is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skilled in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein,” respectively. Moreover, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc., are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects. 

1. A method of capturing device-independent user interface structure in a model based software system comprising: receiving at least one entry point by a business system using a processor; providing a user interface corresponding to the at least one entry point by the processor; capturing user interface meta-data associated with the user interface by the processor; identifying at least one event associated with user interface elements as a response to user actions based on the captured user-interface meta-data by the processor; identifying, by the processor, a pattern signature in the model based software system for reuse in one or more model based software systems based on an expected behavior of the user interface when the identified at least one event occurs; and mapping the identified at least one event to the identified pattern signature by the processor, thereby achieving the user interface structure in the model based software system.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein identifying the at least one event associated with user interface elements as a response to user actions comprises: specifying a type of each user action; specifying user interface elements that are involved in each user action; and identifying the at least one event associated with user interface elements.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising: using the model based software system to generate service interfaces and method interfaces; and using the model based software system to generate a sequence of method calls.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the entry point comprises at least one of a menu item, hyperlink, and/or an option from an application.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the user-interface meta-data comprises specification data associated with the user interface.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one event comprises one or more actions linked to the behavior of the user interface elements.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the user interface elements are selected from the group consisting of edit controls, check boxes, text areas, Combo Boxes, List controls, tabular data, check boxes, display only controls, hyperlinks, command buttons, charts and graphs.
 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising identifying other user interface elements corresponding to the pattern signature based on the mapping to achieve the expected behavior of the user interface.
 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising rendering the user interface structure on different types of devices including desktop, mobiles, tablets, and/or other hand held devices.
 10. A system for capturing device-independent user interface structure in a model based software system comprising: a processor; memory coupled to the processor, and wherein the memory includes a user interface structure capturing module to: receive at least one entry point by a business system; provide a user interface corresponding to the at least one entry point; capture user interface meta-data associated with the user interface; identify at least one event associated with user interface elements as a response to user actions based on the captured user-interface meta-data; identify a pattern signature in the model based software system for reuse in one or more model based software systems based on an expected behavior of the user interface when the identified at least one event occurs; and map the identified at least one event to the identified pattern signature, thereby achieving the user interface structure in the model based software system.
 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the user interface structure capturing module is configured to: specify user interface elements that are involved in each user action; and identify the at least one event associated with user interface elements.
 12. The system of claim 10, wherein the model based software system is used to generate service interfaces, method interfaces, and a sequence of method calls.
 13. The system of claim 10, wherein the entry point comprises at least one of a menu item, hyperlink, and/or an option from an application, and wherein the user-interface meta-data comprises specification data associated with the user interface.
 14. The system of claim 10, wherein the at least one event comprises one or more actions linked to the behavior of the user interface elements, and wherein the user interface elements are selected from the group consisting of edit controls, check boxes, text areas, Combo Boxes, List controls, tabular data, check boxes, display only controls, hyperlinks, command buttons, charts and graphs.
 15. The system of claim 10, wherein the user interface structure capturing module is further configured to identify other user interface elements corresponding to the pattern signature based on the mapping to achieve the expected behavior of the user interface.
 16. The system of claim 10, wherein the user interface structure is rendered on different types of devices including desktop, mobiles, tablets, and/or other hand held devices.
 17. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium for capturing device-independent user interface structure in a model based software system having instructions that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform a method comprising: receiving at least one entry point by a business system; providing a user interface corresponding to the at least one entry point; capturing user interface meta-data associated with the user interface; identifying at least one event associated with user interface elements as a response to user actions based on the captured user-interface meta-data; identifying a pattern signature in the model based software system for reuse in one or more model based software systems based on an expected behavior of the user interface when the identified at least one event occurs; and mapping the identified at least one event to the identified pattern signature, thereby achieving the user interface structure in the model based software system.
 18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17, wherein identifying the at least one event associated with user interface elements as a response to user actions comprises: specifying a type of each user action; specifying user interface elements that are involved in each user action; and identifying the at least one event associated with user interface elements.
 19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17, further comprising identifying other user interface elements corresponding to the pattern signature based on the mapping to achieve the expected behavior of the user interface.
 20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17, further comprising rendering the user interface structure on different types of devices including desktop, mobiles, tablets, and/or other hand held devices. 